Structure Resource Views

Resource and capacity views show more than a list of employees or roles. You can structure these views to analyze resource demand, resource supply, and utilization by several characteristics at the same time.

Structuring is especially useful when a simple employee or role list is not enough. This is often the case with several projects, several teams, similar professional qualifications, or a mixture of planned role work and concrete employee assignment.

When to Use Structured Views

Use structured resource views when you need to clarify:

  • which professional qualifications are required in which project

  • which employees cover which role demand

  • which teams are loaded in which project

  • which projects use the same employees

  • whether an overload comes from one task, one project, or several projects

  • where free capacity is available

Structure a View

Goal: The resource view is grouped by one or more characteristics.

Workflow:

  1. Open a resource or capacity view, for example Employee, Roles, Role utilization, or Human Resource Capacity Balancing.

  2. Click Start > Outline > Structure.

  3. Select the required structure.

  4. Check the newly structured view.

Employee resource view before structuring Role utilization view before structuring

Rillsoft Project adapts the view automatically to the selected structure.

Structure command for resource views

One-Dimensional Structuring

One-dimensional structuring groups the view by one characteristic. This display is clear and suitable for simple evaluations.

Typical characteristics:

  • Employee

  • Role or professional qualification

  • Team

  • Project

Two-Dimensional Structuring

Two-dimensional structuring combines two characteristics. This lets you see not only the resource but also the professional or organizational context.

Typical structures:

  • Employee > Project

  • Team > Employee

  • Role > Employee

  • Project > Employee

Three-Dimensional Structuring

Three-dimensional structuring combines up to three characteristics. This view is intended for complex resource and portfolio analyses.

Typical structures:

  • Project > Role > Employee

  • Team > Project > Employee

  • Role > Team > Employee

Relation to Resource Planning

In resource and capacity planning, structuring mainly helps separate demand from supply.

Use structuring to check:

  • whether planned role demand can be covered completely by employees

  • which professional qualifications are scarce

  • which employees are generally eligible for a role

  • whether shortfall comes from one project or several projects

  • whether a schedule move or another assignment is more appropriate

Relation to Resource Assignment

In resource assignment, structuring helps with concrete assignment decisions.

Use structuring to check:

  • which employee is already planned in which project

  • whether direct employee assignment creates overload

  • whether an employee matches the required professional qualification

  • whether the planned assignment remains plausible in the portfolio context

  • whether another employee with the same qualification is available

Typical Decision Situations

Question

Suitable structure

Which projects load an employee?

Employee > Project

Which employees cover a professional qualification?

Role > Employee

Which roles are missing in a project?

Project > Role > Employee

How is work distributed in the team?

Team > Employee

Which teams are loaded in which projects?

Team > Project > Employee

Typical Mistakes

  • Overload is considered only per employee without checking project, role demand, or shortfall.

  • Role demand is assigned directly to individual employees without comparing available alternatives.

  • Portfolio projects are evaluated individually although the same employees are planned multiple times.

  • The view is structured too deeply although a simple two-dimensional view would be sufficient.